Coverage of  "The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AID" 

Relevant—Do the topics covered include your topic? Does the page cover a variety of (too many) topics or is it focused on one relevant topic?

Adequate—Does the page information adequately cover your topic: is it too general or too detailed?

Audience appropriate—Is the content intended for children, scholars, general public? Was the page written to inform, educate, entertain (parody).

Primary or secondary account (original or regurgitated?)—Does the page offer original (primary) information not covered elsewhere? Is this page a synthesis of other people's (secondary) accounts / writings? Is this the best page to cite, or does another page contain/summarize this information and present it in a better way

Authority   "The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AID" 

Author of site— Is there an author named on the page? Is the author qualified?

Sponsor of site—Is there a sponsor? Is the sponsor qualified? (i.e. Is there an "about us" or "our mission" link?)

Link or contact Information—Is the author or sponsor's name, e-mail, postal address listed?

Clues to page's origin—Is there any other way to determine the page's author(s)? (header, footer, URL or domain name?

Objectivity  "The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AID" 

Bias—Does the page/site show minimal signs of bias: political, ideological, personal, or cultural?

Intent—Does the page present factual information or is it designed to sway opinion?

Influence—Is the site is sponsored or underwritten by advertising, is the writing free of bias supporting the sponsor?

Accuracy  "The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AID" 

Factual—Does the author give factual information?

Documented / well-researched—Does the author cite his/her sources? Is the research methodology explained?

Subject to verification—Can the information be verified by additional resources in print or on the Web?

Corroborated—Are links and resource citations included (possibly using MLA citation format.)

Collaborative—Is a committee or editor named who reviews the content or verifies facts

Currency   "The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AID" 

Date-stamped—Is there a "last updated" notation or evidence of recent changes?

Seemingly current—Does the information seem current to you? Do news events, conference events or any bits information lead you to believe the page has been updated recently?

Linked currently—Are the links still working? Do pages turn up with "this site has moved" or "page not found"

Coverage    "Children and HIV and AIDS–How does HIV and AIDS affect girls and women?"

Relevant—Do the topics covered include your topic? Does the page cover a variety of (too many) topics or is it focused on one relevant topic?

Adequate—Does the page information adequately cover your topic: is it too general or too detailed?

Audience appropriate—Is the content intended for children, scholars, general public? Was the page written to inform, educate, entertain (parody).

Primary or secondary account (original or regurgitated?) -- Does the page offer original (primary) information not covered elsewhere? Is this page a synthesis of other people's (secondary) accounts / writings? Is this the best page to cite, or does another page contain/summarize this information and present it in a better way

Authority     "Children and HIV and AIDS–How does HIV and AIDS affect girls and women?"

Author of site—Is there an author named on the page? Is the author qualified?

Sponsor of site—Is there a sponsor? Is the sponsor qualified? (i.e. Is there an "about us" or "our mission" link?)

Link or contact Information—Is the author or sponsor's name, e-mail, postal address listed?

Clues to page's origin—Is there any other way to determine the page's author(s)? (header, footer, URL or domain name?

Objectivity     "Children and HIV and AIDS–How does HIV and AIDS affect girls and women?"

Bias—Does the page/site show minimal signs of bias: political, ideological, personal, or cultural?

Intent—Does the page present factual information or is it designed to sway opinion?

Influence—Is the site is sponsored or underwritten by advertising, is the writing free of bias supporting the sponsor?

Accuracy     "Children and HIV and AIDS–How does HIV and AIDS affect girls and women?"

Factual—Does the author give factual information?

Documented / well-researched—Does the author cite his/her sources? Is the research methodology explained?

Subject to verification—Can the information be verified by additional resources in print or on the Web?

Corroborated—Are links and resource citations included (possibly using MLA citation format.)

Collaborative—Is a committee or editor named who reviews the content or verifies facts

Currency     "Children and HIV and AIDS–How does HIV and AIDS affect girls and women?"

Date-stamped—Is there a "last updated" notation or evidence of recent changes?

Seemingly current—Does the information seem current to you? Do news events, conference events or any bits information lead you to believe the page has been updated recently?

Linked currently—Are the links still working? Do pages turn up with "this site has moved" or "page not found"

Coverage  " HIV & AIDS VirusMyth: a rethinking AIDS"

Relevant—Do the topics covered include your topic? Does the page cover a variety of (too many) topics or is it focused on one relevant topic?

Adequate—Does the page information adequately cover your topic: is it too general or too detailed?

Audience appropriate—Is the content intended for children, scholars, general public? Was the page written to inform, educate, entertain (parody).

Primary or secondary account (original or regurgitated?) -- Does the page offer original (primary) information not covered elsewhere? Is this page a synthesis of other people's (secondary) accounts / writings? Is this the best page to cite, or does another page contain/summarize this information and present it in a better way

Authority   " HIV & AIDS VirusMyth: a rethinking AIDS"

Author of site—Is there an author named on the page? Is the author qualified?

Sponsor of site—Is there a sponsor? Is the sponsor qualified? (i.e. Is there an "about us" or "our mission" link?)

Link or contact Information—Is the author or sponsor's name, e-mail, postal address listed?

Clues to page's origin—Is there any other way to determine the page's author(s)? (header, footer, URL or domain name?

Objectivity   " HIV & AIDS VirusMyth: a rethinking AIDS"

Bias—Does the page/site show minimal signs of bias: political, ideological, personal, or cultural?

Intent—Does the page present factual information or is it designed to sway opinion?

Influence—Is the site is sponsored or underwritten by advertising, is the writing free of bias supporting the sponsor?

Accuracy   " HIV & AIDS VirusMyth: a rethinking AIDS"

Factual—Does the author give factual information?

Documented / well-researched—Does the author cite his/her sources? Is the research methodology explained?

Subject to verification—Can the information be verified by additional resources in print or on the Web?

Corroborated—Are links and resource citations included (possibly using MLA citation format.)

Collaborative—Is a committee or editor named who reviews the content or verifies facts

Currency   " HIV & AIDS VirusMyth: a rethinking AIDS"

Date-stamped—Is there a "last updated" notation or evidence of recent changes?

Seemingly current—Does the information seem current to you? Do news events, conference events or any bits information lead you to believe the page has been updated recently?

Linked currently—Are the links still working? Do pages turn up with "this site has moved" or "page not found"