Grammar-Quizzes › Connectors › Connective Prepositions › Because Reduced Clause
BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE | |
---|---|
Because is followed by a clause expressing a reason for the effect in the other (main) clause. In other words, because is followed by a full (finite clause) clause. Because an its reason clause can be placed before the main clause for emphasis on the cause. |
|
BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
|
|
|
|
REDUCED REASON CLAUSE | |
---|---|
When the subject of both clauses refers to the same noun, then the reason clause can be replaced with a nonfinite clause (gerund, -ing) and positioned directly before the noun it modifies. A comma separates the clause from the main clause. Because is omitted if the cause-effect relationship can be understood from the context. |
|
MODIFYING CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Working so hard, |
|
Needing help,
|
Tom hired an office assistant. |
Because is the head preposition of the connective prepositional phrase, which takes by a full clause (finite) or a reduced -ing clause (gerund-participle nonfinite clause) as its required complement. [because (P) + Tom worked so hard. (clause) = PrepPhrs) → Working so hard (gerund-particle nonfinite clause).
A finite clause may stand alone as a complete sentence. The clause has a subject and a verb that can be inflected (suffixed) for tense or 3rd person.
A nonfinite clause cannot stand on its own. It rarely includes a subject and the verb cannot be inflected for tense or person. A nonfinite clause may serve as a subject or a complement to a verb, or preposition or noun (as a modifier). It takes form as an infinitival (to) work, gerund-participle -ing or past participle clause -ed.
MODIFYING SUBJECT | |
---|---|
A comma separates a subject-modifying clause placed at the end of the main clause. This is informal use – it is always preferable to place the clause next to the noun it modifies. |
|
MAIN CLAUSE | MODIFYING CLAUSE |
*Tom succeeded, |
working long hours. |
Tom hired an office assistant, |
needing help. |
MODIFYING OBJECT | |
---|---|
No comma is used when an object-modifying clause is placed immediately after the noun it modifies and when it is an identifying clause (required to know exactly which one.) |
|
MAIN CLAUSE | MODIFYING CLAUSE |
Tom hired an office assistant
|
needing work. |
*Tom hired Fred, |
needing work. |
* More formal: Working long hours, Tom hired an office assistant.
Related pages Identifying Clauses Misrelated Clauses
FULL CLAUSE | |
---|---|
A reason clause that (1) includes a be verb and (2) has the same subject as the main clause can be reduced to a modifying clause with being. The events occur at the same time. |
|
BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Because Tom is sick, |
he is unable to work. |
MAIN CLAUSE | BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE |
Tom is unable to work |
because Tom is sick. (same-time events) |
REDUCED CLAUSE | |
---|---|
The be verb in the reason clause is changed to being. The clause is more commonly placed before the clause, immediately before the noun it modifies. |
|
MODIFYING CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Being sick, |
Tom is unable to work. |
MAIN CLAUSE | MODIFYING CLAUSE |
Tom is unable to work, |
being sick.¹ |
¹Also called a dangling modifier or dangling participle. See Misrelated Clauses.
FULL CLAUSE | |
---|---|
A reason clause may indicate an earlier time or event. The clause can be reduced when both clauses refer to the same subject. |
|
BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Because Tom had been working so hard , earlier |
he needed a vacation. later |
V | BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE |
Tom needed a vacation |
because he had been working so hard. |
REDUCED CLAUSE | |
---|---|
The reduced reason clause with the earlier event includes the gerund-participle form of the verb having verb+ed. A comma separates the clauses. |
|
MODIFYING CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Having worked so hard, earlier |
Tom needed a vacation. later |
MAIN CLAUSE | MODIFYING CLAUSE |
Tom needed a vacation |
having worked so hard. |
FULL "BE" CLAUSE | |
---|---|
A reason clause with a be verb may indicate an earlier time or event. The clause can be reduced when both clauses refer to the same subject. |
|
BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Because Tom had been ill the night before, |
he was unable to work the next day. |
MAIN CLAUSE | BECAUSE + REASON CLAUSE |
Tom was unable to work |
because he had been ill the night before. |
REDUCED "BE" CLAUSE | |
---|---|
A reduced reason clause with a be verb and with an earlier event includes the gerund-participle form of the verb having been. A comma separates the clauses. |
|
MODIFYING CLAUSE | MAIN CLAUSE |
Having been ill, earlier |
Tom was unable to work. later |
MAIN CLAUSE | MODIFYING CLAUSE |
Tom was unable to work later |
having been ill. earlier |
ERROR |
---|
*Wearing so little, Elmo seems embarrassed by Katy's dress. The subject of the "wearing so little" is unclear. Is it Elmo or Katy? Pop-Q "because" |
*Working so hard, she doesn't have to work. |
SOLUTION |
---|
Wearing so little, Katy seems to embarrass Elmo with her skimpy dress |
Because he is working so hard, she doesn't have to work. |
*Yellow highlighting marks an example of incorrect usage.