skip navigation
 

writerCopyright, Ethics & Fair Use

Giving credit to other people's work

 

 

Factors in Determining Fair Use

Section 107 of Copyright Act of 1976 (1)

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 & 106A, the fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified in that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

 

 

Some Implications (2)

 

 

Fair Use

Examples

 

 

Artistic Standards & Copyright

Interpretation of amount and substantiality varies.

"Amount is measured both quantitatively and qualitatively. No exact measures of allowable quantity exist in the law. Quantity must be evaluated relative to the length of the entire original and in light of the amount needed to serve a proper objective." (source)

 

Five major elements were changed in the picture on the right:
 

ORIGINAL WORK "NEW" WORK

  Marilyn Poster - Balcony

 

original copyright protected work
"Marilyn Monroe — Balcony" Edward Lunch

Marilyn by artist Razasy

"new" work of art
Razasy "Apple"  http://www.rozasy.com/marilyn/


1.
  Airbrushing
2.  Major color changes (example right)
3.   New items added

  • Borders added/deleted
  • Cropping
  • Letters added/deleted
  • Changes of spacing
  • Shadowing

4. Textures changes
5. Angle changes


The "20% rule" was devised by looking at court case decisions
(cited below) not law.  It posits that a work is considered to be a "new" work or artistic composition if 20% of the image and/or 5 major elements are changed. While some might consider that a "safety zone", it would only take one court case to change that margin of safety.

The "20% rule" would cause the picture on the right to be considered "new".

Major color changes, angle changes, airbrushing and the addition of an inset picture below constitute 20% differentiation.

 

 

 

 

The Mona Lisa - the most altered artwork

Andy Warhol didn't violate copyright when he layered pictures of the Mona Lisa in his work. Many others have done variations of the Mona Lisa - check out the links below!

These are allowable by "amount and substantiality"
 

Mona Moi - Miss Piggy

"Mona Pigga"
Henson 1986
Kermitage Collection

Warhol's Mona Lisa

"Mona Lisa"
Warhol 1963

New Yorker - Mona Lewinsky

"Monica Lewinski"
Roher 1999
New Yorker Magazine

 

Baron, Robert A. V, 23 Arrays of Monas, 2000,http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONA23.htm , 2002
Baron, Robert A., Monalisiana, 2000, http://www.studiolo.org/Mona/MONASV13.htm#LIST, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Use

scales of justiceCourt Cases  

 

 

 

 

Basic Books vs. Kinko's (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (3)
Kinko's was held to be infringing copyrights when it photocopied book chapters for sale to students as course packets for their university classes. The court analyzed word and found that 5 to 25% of the original full book was excessive, thus a violation.

Encyclopedia Britannica v. Crooks (1982) (4)
For-profit producers of educational motion pictures and videos sued a consortium of public schools which was systematically recording programs as they were broadcast on PBS stations and providing copies to member schools. Although work was for educational purposes, the schools were retaining copies for 10 years thus competing with the license.

Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell (1987) (5)
Plaintiff wrote a book based on women's stories of abortions in 1973; she denied the defendant to use her excerpts. The defendant proceeded anyway. The court found that quoting 4.3% of the author's work was not excessive - thus no case.

For more information, read:
Long, Marion. "Fighting the Good Fight: Enforcing Copyright Law on the Web." Inter@ctive Week 08/28/2000, Vol. 7 Issue 34, p40
Bosen, John. "What are copyright rules on the World Wide Web? ." New Hampshire Business Review 06/16/2000, Vol. 22 Issue 13
Guidelines for Instructional Use of Copyrighted Electronic and Multimedia Materials, Princeton University: http://infoshare1.princeton.edu:80/reserves/libcitcopyright.html#genfair

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Use

Strategies

 

 

Avoiding Copyright Infringement   

 

Fair Use Exceptions or "Allowances"

Davidson Hall, "Copyright and Fair Use Guidelines for Teachers."  http://www.halldavidson.net/copyright_chart.pdf

 

 

Resource Links 

  1. Davidson, Hall, "Copyright Resources"    http://www.halldavidson.net/downloads.html#anchor923173
  2. Kent Schol District, "Copyright and Plagiarism Resources", http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/KSD/it/inst_tech/StudentParentResources/copyright_plagiarism.html
  3. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, "Title 17 Copyrights", http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html,
  4. Duke Law, "Tales from the Public Domain: BOUND BY LAW?."  http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/
  5. Barba, Roberta, H., "Copyright and Information Management", San Jose State University, 1999, http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/it/edit186/rcopy/sldtext.html
  6. Stanford Library, "Copyright & Fair Use", http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary/cases/c758FSupp1522.html
  7. Stanford Library, "Copyright & Fair Use",http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary/cases/c558FSupp1247.html
  8. Cochran, Wesley, "Maxtone-Graham v. Burtchaell" http://www2.tltc.ttu.edu/Cochran/Cases%20&%20Readings/Copyright-UNT/maxtonegraham.htm
  9. Princeton University Library, "Guidelines for Instructional Use of Copyrighted Electronic and Multimedia Materials " , http://infoshare1.princeton.edu:80/reserves/libcitcopyright.html#instruct
  10. " A Teacher's Guide to Fair Use", http://home.earthlink.net/~cnew/research.htm
  11. Indiana University, "Fair Use Checklist", 2002 http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/checklist.htm
  12. Indiana University, "Fair Use Overview and Meaning for HIgher Education", http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/highered.htm#amount
  13. Skyline College,  LSCI 100: Introduction to Information Resources.